Discussion
Apr. 25th, 2007 02:45 pmI know I said fic today and, err, it needs quite a bit of work so it's not happening. It's looking good for this weekend, however.
Now, on to my discussion question -
Lately, I've been writing things and being disappointed in them. They're well-received (at least according to the commenters) but I'm disappointed. I've found that the stories I'm most disappointed in are the ones that I had every intention of writing something else but time ran out so I had to tweak. Thus - when I see the story, I see what it could have been and not what it is and am disappointed.
On the other hand - I have one story that I was terribly disappointed in at the time of submittal and now that I've had some distance, I actually enjoyed reading it.
I've also seen a variety of people on my flist saying that they are finally getting to write what they want and not what they have to do.
So here it is - why do we post works that don't make us happy, that don't reflect our visions/skills? Why do we write stuff that simply isn't up to par (as far as we're concerned) and hope that it's good enough for the challenge/prompt/fest/giftee/person? What point do you say "this is good enough"? How do you determine "good enough"? Is it ever "good enough"? Do you eventually like the work?
Now, on to my discussion question -
Lately, I've been writing things and being disappointed in them. They're well-received (at least according to the commenters) but I'm disappointed. I've found that the stories I'm most disappointed in are the ones that I had every intention of writing something else but time ran out so I had to tweak. Thus - when I see the story, I see what it could have been and not what it is and am disappointed.
On the other hand - I have one story that I was terribly disappointed in at the time of submittal and now that I've had some distance, I actually enjoyed reading it.
I've also seen a variety of people on my flist saying that they are finally getting to write what they want and not what they have to do.
So here it is - why do we post works that don't make us happy, that don't reflect our visions/skills? Why do we write stuff that simply isn't up to par (as far as we're concerned) and hope that it's good enough for the challenge/prompt/fest/giftee/person? What point do you say "this is good enough"? How do you determine "good enough"? Is it ever "good enough"? Do you eventually like the work?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-27 03:34 am (UTC)How do I stop myself from tweaking with it? The moment I am done with the fic that I am writing for someone else or for a challenge, I post it straight away. I always have doubts as I write. I always think it's not good enough as I post (this could also be because I procrastinate a lot and don't have a lot of time to do it in the end), but I also know that, given a few days, I always like the outcome once I've distaned myself a couple of days.
To answer the question "is it ever good enough", I would say it always is. That's the way I look at it. I may not think that at first, but good enough is the best you can do. Something that isn't forced because I have to do it, but something that started coming out the moment fingers hit the keyboard.
:)